August 2026

☀️ Did Your Grants Strategy Take a Vacation This Summer?

August is that funny in-between month: vacations are winding down, back-to-school energy is picking up, and fall deadlines are suddenly a lot closer than they looked in June.

So here’s the question: Did your grants strategy take a summer vacation too?
If so, no judgment. Summer can be a lot. But if your team is finalizing your 2026 budget, adjusting your fiscal roadmap, or looking ahead to fall and winter submissions, this is exactly the right time to pause and ask:

Are we set up to pursue the right grants—or just more grants?

A strategic approach to grant funding can dramatically improve focus, competitiveness, and return on effort. The exact win-rate lift varies by organization, but the principle is consistent: teams that plan ahead, align opportunities to mission and capacity, and prepare strong reusable materials are better positioned than teams that scramble from deadline to deadline. As Giving USA notes, strategic planning also helps organizations use grants as part of a long-term funding approach rather than as one-off applications.

And that matters because the grant landscape is shifting quickly.
Grantmakers are looking more closely at outcomes, authenticity, financial resilience, and whether applicants have the systems to deliver what they promise.

At the same time, nonprofits are facing increased demand, financial pressure, staffing strain, and burnout—making it even more important to pursue funding with intention instead of panic. In the Center for Effective Philanthropy’s 2026 State of Nonprofits findings, 73% of nonprofits reported increased demand for services, and the share reporting deficits rose from 22% in 2022 to 39% in 2025.

So this month, let’s bring your grants strategy back from vacation—and make sure it’s ready for what’s next.

Read blog

Don’t Let Uncertainty Steal Your Momentum This Fall

“You do not have to see the whole staircase, just take the first step.” — Martin Luther King Jr.

August has a funny way of making everything feel urgent at once. Summer is winding down, fall deadlines are getting louder, and somewhere between “we should regroup” and “why are there already three grant deadlines in September?” many nonprofits are trying to figure out how aggressively to keep pursuing funding in a difficult environment.

✍️ Grant Writing Tips:

🎯 2026 Grant Readiness: Three Trends to Build Into Your Budget Now

If your organization is budgeting for grant revenue in 2026, your strategy needs to reflect what funders are rewarding now. Here are three high-level shifts to keep on your radar.

Outcomes Over Activities 📊

Funders still care what you do—but they increasingly want to know what changes because you did it.

A proposal that says, “We will serve 500 participants,” is no longer enough by itself. Stronger proposals connect activities to measurable outcomes, such as: -increased student persistence or graduation to X% over a baseline of Y% -improved employment or credential attainment to X%, on par with top-ranked programs -reduced wait times or improved access to services by X% over baseline -improved health, safety, financial stability, or well-being to X, in line with industry benchmarks or best practices

Action step: Before fall deadlines hit, choose 3–5 core outcome metrics for each major program you plan to fund. These do not need to be complicated, but they do need to be clear.

The Authenticity Check 🤖 + 💛

AI can be a useful tool. It can help organize ideas, draft outlines, summarize funder priorities, and turn messy notes into a workable first draft. But AI cannot replace your organization’s voice, credibility, lived knowledge, or relationship to the community you serve.

The nonprofit sector is rapidly adopting AI tools, but research suggests many organizations still need better training, guidance, and practical frameworks for using AI well. A 2026 benchmark study found that while AI adoption is widespread, only a small share of nonprofits report major improvements in organizational capability from AI use so far. Candid also emphasizes that nonprofits need resources and responsible practices to use AI in ways that advance mission-driven impact.

What this means for grants: Generic, overly polished, copy-paste-style proposals are easier than ever to produce—and easier than ever for reviewers to spot.

Your competitive advantage is not sounding perfect. It is sounding specific, grounded, and real.

Action step: Do a “humanity pass” on every proposal.

Ask:

Does this sound like our organization?
Are there concrete examples from our actual work?
Did we include local context, participant voice, or real implementation details?
Would a reviewer understand why we are uniquely positioned to do this?

Pro tip: Use AI for structure and speed, but use your team for strategy, nuance, and trust.

Flexible Funding Still Requires Strong Systems 🧾

The rise of trust-based philanthropy has encouraged more funders to consider flexible support, general operating dollars, multi-year commitments, streamlined processes, and support beyond the check. Candid also noted that some foundations have increased payout rates or grantmaking commitments in response to the changing funding climate.

That is good news—but it does not mean funders are becoming less selective.

Flexible funding often comes with a different kind of scrutiny. Funders want to know whether your organization has: -sound financial management -clear leadership and governance -realistic budgets -reliable data systems -a thoughtful plan for learning and accountability

Action step: As you finalize your 2026 budget, build in the infrastructure that makes you more fundable: evaluation support -financial management systems -CRM or grants management tools -data collection and reporting capacity -staff time for grant stewardship and compliance

Pro tip: Capacity is not “extra.” It is what makes impact repeatable.

Grant Opportunities

Private Higher Education Grants

Award Amount: Typically $25,000–$300,000; larger requests may be considered

Deadline: LOI due August 27, 2026; November 13, 2026 full proposal by invitation

Description: Supports private colleges, universities, and consortia advancing undergraduate education, liberal arts learning, student outcomes, faculty leadership, and related institutional improvement efforts.

Measurement Science and Engineering (MSE)

Award Amount: Unspecified

Deadline: Sep 15, 2026 Rolling

Description: Supports activities that develop, expand, strengthen, or sustain NIST partnership programs and/or support the conduct of research or a recipient's portion of collaborative research including, but not limited to: Metrology; Standards; Nanotechnology; Artificial Intelligence; Advanced Communications; Advanced Manufacturing; Promotion of U.S. innovation and industrial competitiveness; Measurements in Sciences; Neutron Research; and enhancing coordination of the U.S. Standards System with government and private sector organizations.

Targeted Grants to Institutes

Award Amount: Up to $750,000 over 3 years

Deadline: September 30, 2026

Description: Supports established institutes or centers in mathematics and theoretical basic physical sciences to strengthen international scientific collaboration and extend their missions through stable multiyear support.

Mathematical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence (MFAI)

Award Amount: $500,000 - $1,500,000

Deadline: October 9, 2026

Description: Supports research collaborations between mathematicians, statisticians, computer scientists, engineers and social behavior scientists to establish innovative and principled design and analysis approaches for AI technology.

Social Impact Funding

Award Amount: Up to $300,000 over 3 years, plus intensive capacity-building support

Deadline: Rolling/year-round

Description: Provides early-stage, unrestricted support to scalable social enterprises, including U.S. 501(c)(3) nonprofits, working on innovative solutions to significant social and environmental challenges.

Research Program

Award Amount: Typical awards $1 million–$1.3 million over 3 years

Deadline: December 7, 2026 under the new single-phase research application process

Description: Supports high-risk, high-impact basic science, medical research, and science/engineering projects that are distinctive, novel, challenge prevailing paradigms, and could open new research territory

Collaborative Research Grants

Award Amount: Up to $250,000

Deadline: September 16, 2026

Description: Collaborative humanities research projects that result in significant scholarly outputs, such as co-authored books, edited volumes, peer-reviewed articles, or digital humanities projects. For the current funding cycle, projects must focus on American history or culture or Western civilization.

New Partner Alert!

Carinci Consulting is honored to partner with new grant strategy client American Rocketry Challenge, the world’s largest student rocket competition, to advance their exciting mission. We are fired up to help fuel the next stage of growth for a program that inspires students to aim high, take on big challenges, and launch bright futures.

Lessons Learned:

🧠 Grant Readiness Is Not a Volume Game Anymore

One of the biggest traps nonprofits fall into is assuming that more applications automatically mean more funding.

Sometimes volume helps—but only when it is paired with strategy. Otherwise, more applications can simply mean more rushed proposals, more staff burnout, more misalignment, and more missed opportunities to build relationships with better-fit funders.

Here are the lessons I’d carry into the rest of 2026.

Lesson 1: A budget is not a grants strategy. If your 2027 budget plan includes “grant revenue,” pause and ask: from where, by when, and based on what evidence?

A strong grants strategy connects your budget to:-specific funder targets-realistic timelines-historical win rates or success signals-internal capacity-program readiness-relationship-building steps

Try this: For each grant revenue line in your budget, identify the top 3–5 likely funders or opportunities that could actually support it. If you cannot name them, that revenue may be more hope than strategy.

Lesson 2: Data collection now is future funding. If your organization wants more grant revenue in 2027, one of the highest-ROI investments you can make right now is better data collection.

That does not always mean a fancy dashboard. It may mean:-a cleaner intake form-consistent attendance tracking-pre/post surveys-outcome definitions everyone uses the same way-a simple quarterly impact review-a shared folder for stories, quotes, and program photos

Try this: Choose one program and ask: “What would we need to prove this is working by December?” Then start collecting that information now.

Lesson 3: Funder alignment beats application volume. A well-matched proposal has a stronger chance than a generic proposal sent to ten funders.
Before pursuing an opportunity, ask:-Does this funder already support work like ours?-Do we fit their geography, population, and issue priorities?-Is the typical award size worth the effort?-Can we deliver and report on what they require?-Is this relationship worth building even if we do not win this round?

Try this: Use a simple green/yellow/red rating system for every opportunity before you start writing.

🟢 Strong fit: pursue

🟡 Possible fit: pursue only if capacity allows

🔴 Weak fit: release with confidence

Lesson 4: Authenticity is a strategy. In an AI-heavy proposal environment, specificity matters more than ever.
Funders want to understand not just what your program is, but why your organization is the right one to deliver it. That requires details only you can provide:-what your community is telling you-what you have learned from implementation-where your model has adapted-what makes your partnerships real-what outcomes you can credibly stand behind

Try this: Add a “what we’ve learned” paragraph to your next proposal. Funders appreciate organizations that can reflect, adapt, and improve.

Lesson 5: Trust-based funding rewards trustworthiness. Flexible funding is not a free pass. It is an invitation to demonstrate that your organization can use resources responsibly, learn honestly, and communicate clearly.
The Trust-Based Philanthropy Project describes trust-based grantmaking as rooted in transparency, relationship, and practices that reduce unnecessary burden on nonprofits. But from the applicant side, that means being ready to show funders that you have the systems and leadership to steward flexible dollars well.

Try this: Prepare a one-page “organizational readiness snapshot” that includes:-current strategic priorities-key outcomes from the past year-financial health indicators-governance/leadership strengths-current funding mix-top capacity needs

This can become a powerful tool for conversations with foundations, major donors, and partners.

Bottom Line: Grant readiness in 2026 and beyond is not about chasing every opportunity. It is about being intentional.

If your budget depends heavily on grants or you are looking to diversify your funding to include more grants, your best investment may not be submitting more applications. It may be strengthening the systems that make better applications possible: sharper outcomes, stronger data, clearer funder fit, authentic narratives, better financial and reporting systems, and realistic capacity planning.That is how you move from “We need grants” to “We are ready for the right grants.”

🎯 Ready to Bring Your Grants Strategy Back from Vacation?
If your team is heading into fall with big funding goals but a fuzzy plan, you are not alone.